Zombie Ideas in Agricultural Leadership

by Eric Kaufman--

A few months ago, The Leadership Quarterly published an article on “Zombie leadership: Dead ideas that still walk among us” (Haslam et al., 2024).  The article focuses on the “strong residual commitment to an older set of ideas which have been repeatedly debunked but which nevertheless resolutely refuse to die” (p. 1).  For example, one of the axioms of zombie leadership is that “leadership is a special skill limited to special people.”  This belief persists, despite “mountains of research” that highlight the detrimental effects of leadership approaches based on elitism (e.g., focusing on “high potentials”).  These zombie ideas are problematic because they limit the potential of leadership development.  As noted in the article:

“By only looking for leadership amongst leaders we only find it there and bury all signs of leadership from below. By only recognizing, training, selecting and nurturing a few in positions of leadership we ensure that only a few develop the qualities associated with leadership.” (Haslam et al., 2024, p. 9)

When I consider the context of agriculture, I see a number of Zombie ideas that are limiting the potential for effective leadership.  Since the emergence of the Kellogg Farmers Study Program in 1965, there has been broad awareness of the importance of leadership development at all levels of agriculture (Kaufman et al., 2012).  Even still, the idea persists that technical skill development is sufficient preparation for agricultural careers.  For example, a study published this past summer reveals agricultural employers believe durable skills such as communication, teamwork, problem-solving, and cross-cultural competence are important, yet they are not prioritizing funding for related training (McDonald et al., 2024). Perhaps even more concerning, research indicates that students recognize the importance of “soft skills” (including oral communication skills, effective use of written communication skills, planning and completing projects, analyzing information to solve problems, teamwork, and leadership skills), yet they doubt current schooling can strengthen such skills (Juhász & Horváth-Csikós, 2021). 


The images depicts the outdated leadership ideas that persist, with zombie-like figures symbolizing these dead concepts still walking among us.

While stakeholders in agriculture recognize leadership can be learned (Kaufman et al., 2010), the persistent emphasis (or over emphasis) on technical skills seems to be overshadowing the potential for attention to leadership development.  The zombie idea that “soft skills” are secondary to technical expertise creates a dangerous feedback loop: agricultural education doesn’t invest in developing durable skills because they are not seen as essential, and employers don’t demand them because they assume technical skill development is the only outcome to expect from educational programs. In order to stave off the zombie apocalypse, agricultural leadership must pivot toward valuing durable skills as foundational, not supplementary, to workforce success. Leaders need to challenge zombie ideas, recognizing that equipping the next generation of agricultural workers with strong communication, teamwork, and problem-solving skills will foster more resilient and adaptive teams. By investing in these areas, the sector can ensure its workforce is prepared not just for today’s challenges but for future, unforeseen crises.


References

Haslam, S. A., Alvesson, M., & Reicher, S. D. (2024). Zombie leadership: Dead ideas that still walk among us. The Leadership Quarterly, 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101770 

Juhász, T., & Horváth-Csikós, G. (2021). The emergence of soft skills in agricultural education. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 453. http://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.37 

Kaufman, E. K., Rateau, R. J., Carter, H. S., & Strickland, L. R. (2012). What’s context got to do with it? An exploration of leadership development programs for the agricultural community. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.12806/V11/I1/RF7 

Kaufman, E. K., Rateau, R. J., Ellis, K. C., Kasperbauer, H. J., & Stacklin, L. R. (2010). Leadership program planning: Assessing the needs and interests of the agricultural community. Journal of leadership education, 9(1), 122-143. https://doi.org/10.12806/V9/I1/RF8 

McDonald, N., Luke, J., & Cosby, A. (2024). Non-Technical Skills Needed for the Current and Next-Generation Agricultural Workforce. Agriculture, 14(7), 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071106 

Acknowledgement

The image within this blog post was created with DALL·E 3 using OpenIA (2024) ChatGPT [large language model].  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Agriculture Peer Group Formation at the Virginia Community College System

Image
by Adam O'Neal -- Based on input from a cohort of agriculture faculty from around Virginia, an Agriculture and Food Systems Peer Group has been constituted by the Virginia Community College System (VCCS) to serve the needs of agriculture program faculty around the Commonwealth of Virginia. Peer groups have existed for other disciplines for some time, but none for this area of study until now. From the shared experiences of the Agriculture Workforce Training for Collaborative Leadership (AWT4CL) cohort members and other agriculture faculty, we understand that collaboration at professional levels has proven challenging. This peer group promises potential benefits to agriculture faculty in unraveling professional challenges and related classroom and teaching concerns. Agriculture is the largest private industry in Virginia, with over 43,000 farms contributing to $82.3B a year in economic impact (Virginia Farm Bureau, n.d.). Though a number of Virginia Community College System ( V
Read more

Integrating Employability Skills in a Traditional Ag Classroom through Learning Badges

Image
by Dr. Mallory White -- To weave workforce readiness skills into a traditional agriculture classroom can be a little challenging. My first-year animal science class tackled four of the twelve AWT4CL employability learning/digital badges. This blog discusses how we did it, challenges and possible lessons for the instructor and the student, and overall perception of the digital badges.  How We Did It   First, I set aside one lab period to discuss the project and complete many of the in-class activities. This required me to combine two traditionally separate, short labs into one to free up a week, but I was determined to make room for important employability content . The activities from each digital badge created by the badge authors are short and effective, but I wanted the students to do more in order to earn a badge. As an instructor, it can be difficult to come up with new, creative activities in the limited time we have. As I was rushing to come up with additional activities and
Read more

Gamification or “Jobification” – Applying Game Design Approaches as a Bridge to Workforce Skills

Image
  by Celeste Carmichael -- Gamification is a known program design approach used to provide motivation for students and participants to complete tasks - offering visual, virtual, and sometimes tangible rewards and validation of learning. In recent years, and particularly with the broader adoption of e-learning and hybrid work in higher education, experimentation and documentation of gamification as a part of classroom pedagogy has grown .  Beyond content transfer, can this same strategy be used to connect relevant past experiences for students to current classroom learning? Some faculty from the Virginia Community College System involved in the Agriculture Workforce Training for Collaborative Leadership (AWT4CL) are applying these approaches to help students to bridge informal and formal learning experiences, connecting the dots on experiences that can translate to valuable workforce attributes. The AWT4CL cohort members have noted that digital badges used in this way can help studen
Read more